My first few weeks with a 3D printer

About 3 weeks ago my Micro 3D Printer arrived from their Kickstarter campaign. Needless to say I was absolutely ecstatic. I came home from work, ripped it open, and pulled out an old laptop with Windows on it (their software is Windows-only for the moment). Once I got everything set up, the first thing that caught me off guard was that there were no models to print provided by the software. The Unofficial intro video was nice, but I was overly excited and didn’t notice the description provided a model; I expected a model in the “downloads” section of the site or even pre-loaded with the software. In fact I didn’t realize that model was there until just now as I went to write this blog post. Derp. (It’s nearly finished as I’m about to publish this post.)

IMG_20150410_223521

My initial attempts to print didn’t go great. I didn’t feed the filament in properly, so it began to print but stopped. I was using black plastic, so I thought it was just hard to see against the black print bed. Nope! I switched to blue and really made sure it got in there; you can feel it pulling when you insert it. It seems so obvious now. I’ve had the same kind of failure happen a couple of times but I just watch it toward the beginning and it usually goes well.

The first thing I printed was a “pencil holder” mostly because it was the first thing I found that was acceptable in my mind to print. It would have taken forever (8 hours) at its real size, and I just wanted to hold something in my hand, so I scaled it to 25% in each dimension. I didn’t realize it, but that means what I printed was ~1.6% the designed volume (0.25 cubed). At 1.5 hours estimated I was happy with how it turned out. The estimates are always low though, sometimes by 50%.

Lizard Print

People might wonder about an odor, and my experience is that it’s detectable but not bothersome when on my desk next to my laptop. It also prints a flat square thing as the basis and you have to peel it off, and you have to peel that basis off the print bed. That basis takes a bit of time to print, and does use at least a couple grams of filament but for most prints that isn’t a big deal. Another weird thing is that there is a “percent complete” provided on the computer, but it drags on slowly as that basis is printed and speeds up considerably once it’s done. You also can’t unplug the printer from the computer during printing.

After this proof-of-concept, my next goal was to make the process simpler. I was using the “external” way of feeding the filament into the printer, but I wanted to use the “internal” one instead, figuring it would unspool automatically while inside. After a lot of frustration, and being told by their customer service that they don’t recommend doing it, I have the same advice: don’t even bother. Their software isn’t very forgiving either, so when I couldn’t manage to do it I had to restart the software which required moving the print head around for no apparent reason. I’ll discuss what customer service recommended later.

Next up I printed a Baterang and a Superman thing. All these prints were at “low quality” so I tried a “high quality” baterang which was tremendously more time consuming (at least a factor of 2, perhaps more). The only noticeable difference between the two prints seemed to be a fluke. It definitely wasn’t 2x better, and “low quality” actually did look good. All three prints are also very solid and light, they’re sturdier than they look. Next I printed Tux the Linux penguin. I rigged something weird up with my bike’s U-lock (a recommendation of my roommate) so that it could go overnight, and that worked well as a temporary solution. Tux is what I use as a representative successful print when showing people. It was also my first print where the software automatically added support structures which are meant to gently broken off. I’m very, very happy about it.

BaterangIMG_20150411_092554IMG_20150412_095323

At this point I wanted to go from decoration to useful things. I tried printing a simple toilet-paper holder since I don’t like the one in my apartment currently. The model didn’t quite fit in the software, so I scaled it to 93% on the longest dimension thinking it’d be fine. Noooope. Shoulda measured it. My roommate had the good idea of using this mistake to hold the filament spool for overnight prints. I decided it was worth giving “high quality” another try.

I decided on Tux since it was relatively complex and because it had turned out so well it’d be a great reference. The software estimated 8 hours so it was a good candidate in terms of time estimates as well. It ended up being a relative failure and took over 12 hours. The print stopped working while printing the top of the head, so that was bad news, but the parts that actually did get printed didn’t look any better. Lesson learned: “low quality” is just fine.

IMG_20150426_215817

At this point, I contacted support about longer prints. I emailed on a Monday morning and heard back the following Thursday. Saturday morning I finally got to the email. They said not to use the internal thing, which was disappointing; why not mention this somewhere sooner, to prevent my time being wasted? Next they gave me a Dropbox link to a model for a two-part print of a spool holder that attaches on the outside of the printer (pics: without filament, with filament). By the time I went to use it, the Dropbox link was dead. I was really sad then, since the next business day was Monday and then based on experience it’d be another four days. Crap!

I decided next to try to get their software to work in Wine, so that I could get myself off Windows. That was a failure; I haven’t contacted customer support with the error I had, and at this point I have no intention of doing so, at least not while they’re still taking pre-orders. Since Wine was a no-go I then tried VirtualBox with Windows 7 as my guest OS. That was also a failure, but while going back to their site to get their software again I noticed the models were available for download on their site! Whoo! (This was dumb luck though, not customer support.)

Successful print next to terribly failed print.

Successful print next to terribly failed print.

So back to printing I went. They suggested the spool holder for my 8+ hour prints, so I was unpleasantly surprised when the model provided was estimated to take 8.5 hours. Wtf, right? After multiple painful print attempts I eventually get the spool holder working. I went back to trusty Tux for an overnight print (can’t remember if I tried “high quality” or not) and that didn’t turn out well (separate failed pic print). I contacted customer support again, with pictures of my setup and the failed print. After a full business week I haven’t heard back from them. I do realize they’re busy, but it’s not a great experience. Giving them the benefit of the doubt is tough too, if only because they sent me a link that was dead after two days.

As time has gone on, my enthusiasm and optimism have plummeted. Once I got things going, I was planning on extending an open offer for friends to do prints. Filament is cheap, so if I could just set it to go overnight that’d be fine. But right now I feel like I have to watch all my prints and invest a ton of time, so anything that anyone would want to print is going to be something I have really invest myself in.

My printer with the spool holder and a spool (current setup).

My printer with the spool holder and a spool (current setup).

A lot of the possibilities with a 3D printer involves me learning CAD as well, to make my own things (as great as Thingiverse is). With the failure rate I’ve seen, I’m not sure I can stand to spend several hours learning CAD, designing a thing, and having repeated failed prints. Surely someone can tolerate this, but I’m not up for it today.

My general conclusion is: their website is tacky, their customer service isn’t great, and the printer itself is hit-or-miss. I wouldn’t advocate against one if you’re still interested after reading all this, but I was hoping to like it enough to want to donate one to my high school. I’m definitely not doing that yet.

For anyone who really wants to pre-order one and get going here are my suggestions: Stick to PLA plastic (this is the recommendation on their site right now, though it wasn’t when I did my orders), Thingiverse is awesome, print the spool holder right away without bothering with the “internal,” ignore “high quality” prints, remove and re-insert filament after letting it sit cold for more than an hour, expect prints to take up to 2x the estimate, and keep on eye on all prints at least every 15 minutes.

If customer support magically fixes things, or they request taking the printer back for modifications, I’ll probably post back here. Same if any really useful prints come out of it, or if I get into CAD (I plan on trying Blender and Anim8or). I’m still optimistic about this printer and things I might do with it, although my enthusiasm has waned as failed prints have happened.

Handtrap Quick-exceed Gadgets

I’ve been wanting to for a while, and am finally going to write a blog post about my current Gadget build. I have the screenshot below, and underneath it the deck list.

Monsters (33)

Spells (7)

Traps (0)

Extra Deck (15)

I won’t include my side deck here, even though (or perhaps because) I think it is essential to this deck’s success. You can use your imagination about the side deck might include.

Tech Choices

Hand traps over Trap cards: Like any Gadget player, I originally played very heavy back row. There is clearly some synergy in that, where you place a little weeny monster on the field that your opponent knows they have to clear, or else they’ll have an Exceed to deal with. But over time I became frustrated with traps, because they’re slow, not searchable*, often awful, awful top decks, extremely vulnerable to destruction (end phase MST, ugh!) and Royal Decree, and sometimes you just plain have the wrong one for the situation. I found that having a solid extra deck that can solve problems, and the ability to use that extra deck at will, to be much preferable.
Having no traps makes you very vulnerable, of course. I mitigated this with a heavy hand trap lineup, with Veiler, Maxx, Gorz and Trag. My experience has been that this is not just an adequate to traps, but markedly superior!
A properly timed Veiler is a huge deal. I do not use it in an attempt to stop my opponent’s engine, which I, as a Gadget player, realize likely has some redundancy anyway. I save it for when my opponent needs to solve an important problem, be it Gear Gigant X with one more search remaining, a Machina Fortress that they thought they could Honor ARK, or even a defense mode Redox because if they can’t hit over it then I can probably make a rank 4 play the next turn.
Maxx “C” is used similarly. I don’t simply use it for a regular +1 unless I’m desperate (which admittedly, does happen on occasion). I use it, again, when I’ve created a problem that my opponent needs to solve. Maxx discourages them from solving it, gives me the ability to possibly stop them (Veiler), and gives me pluses when they really, really don’t want that. It’s a mindfuck and also just plain strategically troublesome when they prepare to make a play with a certain card advantage in mind, but everything they thought was true in life was wrong.
Plus Gorz is level 7, and Tragoedia with Gearframe, and the ability to search levels 7, 8 and 10, is a nightmare for synchro decks.

* Being able to search Bottomless Trap Hole with the Traptrix searcher isn’t good enough!

Gigantes: I love this card so much. I haven’t seen this in any other Gadget deck, ever. It’s big, inherent, good on its own, you can it it multiple times per turn, and besides allowing for rank 4 plays, it on occasion clears a ton of back row. I often side out one of them because it is not good first turn, although I once had someone Solemn Warning it (after I’d banished a Maxx “C”) and was able to then banish the other one in grave. So great. It’s also often a solution to Thunder King Rai Oh, whether they negate the summon, you can crash (and take back row with it!) or simply leave it there for fear of D Prison or Mirror Force, since they have to hit it and lose back row. I once summoned it against a Thunder King and three back row, and after asking if he had a response to summon, I crashed, taking with it BTH, Warning and MST. Sometimes people don’t read it, and sometimes they just figure you’re about to exceed so why not save you answers for that?

Redox: It’s stupid broken. Not sure it’s entirely ban worthy, but it really ties the deck together. It’s searchable with Lavalval Chain, it’s good in hand, in grave, and it bounces back between being offensive and defensive. At three it was really broken with Gigantes, but it’s still good now. Assuming you have a monster in grave, after summoning a Gadget, you can discard Redox and the just-searched Gadget for cost, target that just-searched card, and then it acts like a Double Summon (though Double Summon is a little better). Redox isn’t a -1 when you do this. The next turn, you can bring it out as a defense, and then use it as a Double Summon again after that. You can also use it to get back Crimson Blader, Machina Fortress, or whatever else.

Tin Goldfish: When Redox was at three, I just ran a single Goldfish, but now it’s important to have all three for the rank 4 support. It’s searchable with Gear Gigant X, you can set it against Thunder King in a pinch, and it often baits Veilers from players who are terrible, don’t know about Double Summon, or don’t know about Gigantes. It is vulnerable to Maxx “C” though.

Double Summon: This card is often criticized as a -1, as of course Veiler and Book of Moon are too, if you don’t think about their power. There are a whopping twelve monsters in this deck though for which a normal summon is a +1, mitigating the downside of Double Summon very clearly. As mentioned, it also synergizes well with Tin Goldfish being negated, and of course works better with Machina Gearfame than Tin Goldfish does. Again though, I often side out one or two because it’s relatively slow, only being usable once per turn.

The Machinas: It took me a long time to put Machinas and Gadgets together. I was extremely reluctant at first because Machina Fortress is initially a -1, most of the time, and I really hated that. Back when I was running traps, I put in a single Fortress to try to make extra Gadgets in hand not useless, then put a Gearframe in because it’s searchable with Gear Gigant X, then put a second Fortress in so that Gearframe would be dead so much less often. I still hated it though, since although it was nice for ditching a secondary Gadget, it was still a -1 (unless your opponent doesn’t have a good solution to it, which is often the case but I hate to rely on that), and sometimes it was your only option to lose the Gadget engine to summon it! That was always devastating. Then something happened…
Redox. Redox at three was a really, really consistent way to get Fortress into the grave with a -1, since I could ditch Redox and Fortress for cost, target a Gadget in grave, and then get a search. That Gadget search was extra, obviously, so not entirely useful, but there were huge upsides to this. The extra gadget add redundancy, making Fiendish Chain, Veiler, etc. unable to ruin the engine. That card in hand makes Trag fatter. You’d rather have it in hand than in the deck. And in a pinch, if you really need to, you can still give up the two Gadgets in hand for Fortress. With triple Redox and Gigantes, Lavalval Chain made getting Redox into hand trivial for this. When Redox became limited, I thought that the deck was dead. I kept playing it though, and realized that between getting Redox by it simply bouncing, or getting a second Gadget (quite likely) it wasn’t too bad. I even sometimes would search Fortress when I already had one in hand, so that their -1 could be combined.
I also play Force over three Cannon mostly because I love stealing an opposing Trag, Red Eyes, Ultimate Axon Kicker or any other level 10 on the rare occasion I can, but Force also doesn’t get hit by Deck Devastation Virus and having the diversity makes you less susceptible to Mind Crush. (Oh boy do I love it though when people Mind Crush on Machina Fortress!) I do very rarely summon Cannon with its own effect, but I’ve never wanted to when I only had Force. Never.


Ouroboros
– This guy is awesome. I don’t have any other good answer to something like Safe Zone with Key Beetle, but I’ve won games because this guy fixes that. Being able to banish an important card from your opponent’s grave is great too, as well as being able to take a card out of the opponent’s hand is helpful, against Exodia for example. With Book of Moon you can activate one of the effects a second time as well. (There was a time I banished something, then next turn activated another effect to take a card out of their hand that they Veiler’d, and I used Book of Moon to avoid Veiler, and then I flip summoned it and got a third card out of their hand.)

Daigusto Emeral – A great passive play to replenish resources and regain hand advantage, as well as put back hand traps. I love this card so much. It’s another card your opponent really can’t let you use a second time. I haven’t found that I can often enough make it twice to run two and use a loop.

Plays

First turn: a typical great first turn is to search Gearframe with Gear Gigant X. You can do so with Double Summon and Tin Goldfish, or even Redox if you’re going second and used a hand trap already. Sometimes you can even Goldfish into Gigant X, search Gearframe, then Double Summon, search again, and defend Gear Gigant X by using the Union effect. When I have Veiler or Maxx in hand, I do this because it creates a problem your opponent needs to solve, as well as thinning the deck of three cards on the first turn (it is only a net +1 though, first turn).
If you open with Gear Gigant X and Trag though, I would caution against this unless you know you won’t be seeing synchros (or Red Eyes). I say this because I can’t tell you how many times I made Gear Gigant X, searched Gearframe, and my fearful opponent hit it with Crimson Blader thinking they’d lock me out. When you take the damage, you can drop Trag, then on your turn search Machina Cannon with Gearframe and then use Trag’s effect to steal the Crimson Blader (sometimes then getting to hit your opponent’s monster with it too!). At this point Trag is still 3000 attack and defense, so I usually leave it in defense mode, but sometimes you can hit with it. You can also make a rank 4 with it since it can copy one of the things in grave you used to make Gear Gigant X, and Gearframe is on the field.

Evilswarm Exciton: This deck tends to maintain serious advantage, but even so you can often abuse this powerful card. Double Summon does not summon the monster when it resolves, it simply allows you to do so later. Because of this, you can -1 with it temporarily, clear the field, then perform that/those normal summon(s) and recoup that loss. Even better than this though is Redox’s effect so get a monster from your own grave. As discussed, although it’s supposed to be a -1 you can break even when summoning a Gadget. Before it resolves though, it is a -2, and since Exciton is a quick effect, you can chain it to Redox! This has the added benefit that anything Exciton destroyed that can, will miss timing. You can also special Redox from grave as a way to cause things to miss timing, or if you’re already at a disadvantage, chain it to Double Summon. Theoretically you can use Fortress or Cannon to -1 to use Exciton, though I’ve never done so, because you commit to the field and then lose it.
Exciton works especially well in this deck for two more reasons. (1) There are no traps, so field commitment is what you make of it (which is entirely minimal if you’re smart). And then there’s (2) that sometimes your opponent will set their entire hand to target Machina Fortress!

Queen Dragun Djinn: This card is here mostly because if you have Redox in hand and want to make a rank 7 play as well as have a 2200 beater, it’s not always easy or possible. Queen Dragun also negates the monster effect, so Redox will not bounce, which can be useful sometimes as a huge wall. The extra deck also doesn’t run a lot of beaters, and Gear Gigant X is typically used early game to get the engine going. If Maestroke is already on the field, she’s a very safe play as well.

Lavalval Chain: Sometimes you want to use your rank 4s to gain more advantage, but already have a six card hand. This hand enables that, since you can send to the grave Redox or Machina Fortress. Sending Fortress is still a -1, since you exceed to do it, but you don’t sacrifice the Gadget engine and if your opponent leaves it on the field you can send Redox. I tend to send Fortress before Redox because I don’t want to draw Fortress, but Redox is great to draw into. It depends on your hand too, of course. On rare occasions I’ve even top decked cards with it, though that’s not usually what you want. (Hint hint, I’m not showing my side deck, but this card works well with Skill Prisoner….)

Herp derp: This deck has more derp in it than might be expected. I recently had an Azure Eyes deck drop on me the following: Azure Eyes (the previous turn), Blue Eyes, Red Eyes and Ancient Fairy Dragon, along with a set S/T that I feared. Say what you will about that deck in general, that field is something to be reckoned with! He was trying to OTK, but I had Trag, so he couldn’t. When it came my turn, I cleared his whole field. I start my turn top decking Fortress, and already having a Cannon and a Gearframe in hand. I started by using Trag to steal Ancient Fairy Dragon, discarding Fortress for cost (this time discarding Fortress was even a +1!). 1/5 way there. I then discarded Cannon to summon that Fortress, went Big Eye and took Red Eyes. 2/5 there. Next summoned Gearframe, searched another Cannon, and then Trag copied level 4 so I could Honor ARK the Blue Eyes with Trag and Gearframe. So 3/5 the way there now, controlling Red Eyes, Big Eye and Honor ARK. I then ditched the second Cannon to get Fortress, and crashed Azure Eyes with Fortress, which was a +1 since I could pop the back row (MST here, oh well). I realize that this whole thing could potentially have been stopped, but there’s no way modern trap Gadgets could have done anything like this without Ultimate Offering (which, incidentally, would have gotten MST’d).
I’ve also stolen a Quasar before have my opponent made it under Maxx C. It’s times like this I side out two Double Summons, so that if I Maxx “C” then I can use as many of the cards in my hand as possible.
I’ve also calculated that if you Maxx “C” in response to Genex Birdman’s effect summon when Karakuri Geargia are going off, there is about a 95% chance of getting at least one of the three between Gorz or Trag to stop the OTK. You then can steal their monsters with Trag, and make a lot of different plays.

Problems

Drawing useless Gadgets is the obvious and well-known problem. Let’s start by putting this in perspective though: with a forty card deck, having no Duality’s or Upstart Goblins to throw things off and rounding by 1%, about 20% of the time you’ll open zero Gadgets, one Gadget about 40% of the time, two Gadgets 30% of the time, and for three or more you get the remaining 10% (specifically, about 9.5%, 1.5% and then .1% and 0.00% for 3, 4, 5 and 6). That means that you’ll open 3 or more gadgets both games one and two about 1% of the time, and for a three-game match, you’ll open three Gadgets about 2.8% of the time. Now this doesn’t include your 7th draw, because I didn’t want to account for all the different ways the deck could get thinned first. But I think this stats are pretty reassuring, especially considering that just as likely as you are to get at least one Gadget, back row before factoring in opposing player interruptions, you’re just as likely to be able to get a Gearframe search of Fortress to mitigate those extra Gadgets.

Another problem with this build is that on occasion you’ll open two or three of the big Machinas but no Fortress or Gearframe. At times like this, I try extremely hard to make Lavalval Chain and dump a Fortress. This is slow, and any good deck that draws OK will outpace that. It’s also a problem if they can solve Fortress once you drop it. I’ve thought about dropping the big Machina (Cannon, Force) count, but spamming Fortress in this build is essential since the extra deck is for engine and problem solving.

There are some obvious side deck vulnerabilities as well. Thunder King Rai Oh, though there’s Gigantes, Book of Moon, and Dark Hole, is really, really annoying. Luckily though it’s limited and it’s more devastating if they open it than if they get it later. Mistake, the continuous trap, hurts. There are plenty of cards to side if you’re concerned about face up continuous traps though, so I side appropriately. Skill Drain is a similar problem, although Gigantes often solves it quite well. Kaiser Colosseum stop the rank 4 plays pretty hard, although if you can successfully summon Machina Fortress you can often sit on it for quite a long time.

Leo, the level ten synchro, is a huge problem, as is Felgrand. I’ve thought about putting Limiter Removal back in the deck, but see both infrequently enough that I haven’t done it.

Match ups

Geargia Karakuri – Maxx “C” hurts them so bad, especially being able to drop Trag. I have had very little problem with this.

Plus One Fist – I haven’t seen much of it since Wolfbark went to one, but it was a problem match up. You can’t fearlessly summon a Gadget, Trag and Gorz aren’t very helpful, and while other decks have a problem with the Exceed spam every turn, they just popped it! So annoying. I’ve heard people talk about Call of the Haunted replacing Wolfbark. I won’t go into why, but that doesn’t scare me at all.

Bujins – Played well, I can get over them most of the time, though it’s somewhat difficult. This deck can play around though by things such as Blackship of Corn if they just have Hare, Diamond Dire Wolf if they just dumped Turtle, since they’ll have to burn Turtle and one of Crane or Honest to keep Yamato, plus sides like Mind Control and Creature Swap can hurt them. Fortress is also a huge problem for them, of course. This match up also got a lot easier when I realized a certain Ally of Justice monster is searchable with Gear Gigant X….

Hieratics – Pretty much the same as Karakuri Geargia. They take a few turns to set up, and I just find that I can stop their OTK by then most of the time.

Pure Gearia – Harder than the Karakuri version. This deck can grind through traps pretty well, but if they open Armor and two three good traps, it’s very very difficult to keep up with them.

Harpies – Very easy match up. All the hand traps really hurt them, I’m not afraid of Hunting Ground, Abyss Dweller occasionally hits their engine hard, and the problem really is that if you just stop one of their plays, or get a +1 with Maxx they’re in trouble.

Dragons – A tough match up because of Skill Drain. They just have so much draw power, and they can become aggressive very quickly. Getting Redox quickly, as a defense, is essential.

Blackwings – Gigantes really, really hurts them. Fortress is a pretty big problem as well. If you focus on controlling only a single monster at a time, you can make their Icarus’s virtual dead. Not too problematic.

Constellars – Lacking a monster engine, they just can’t keep up. Omega doesn’t help them much here obvious, and Pleides doesn’t handle Fortress well. Royal Decree also tends to present a tremendous problem for them.

Evilswarm – Similar to Constellars, with the obvious problem that Ophion can be problematic. Decree is again really helpful, and the rank 4 plays tend to be good enough. If you drop Fortress before they have Ophion, that’s a tremendous problem for them as well.

Mermails – Again, running no back row helps a lot since they don’t get pluses off of Marksman. This is another match up where Mind Control is wonderful, and Trag can steal level 4 or 7. Trag can get around Gaios as well if you have 5 or more cards in hand, since you can simply copy a level 4 in grave to hit Gaios. Abyss Dweller and Blackship of Corn also hit this deck pretty hard.

Infernity – I never see the synchro version anymore, so I can’t say about that. But the exceed version isn’t very scary, especially with Barrier to one. The hand traps tend to hurt a lot, and a defense mode Maestroke is a problem for them. And again, I have some nice sides.

Windups – Again, hand traps hurt them quite bad, but they can be rough if they get factory and a good trap or two.

Abandoned Techs

I’ve tried a lot of different things in this deck, and considered others. I’ll record here some of the things I decided against at various points.

Reptile Support – Kagetokage and King of Feral Imps are some cards people have seen in Gadgets before. I’ve found that Gigantes, Double Summon and Tin Goldfish are all preferable. Gigantes is good by itself and is inherent, Double Summon isn’t a special summon and thins the deck, and Tin Goldfish is a machine, so you can make Gear Gigant X and then search Gearframe.
The one big advantage of Kagetokage is that unlike Tin Goldfish, Veiler, Fiendish and Skill Drain don’t stop you from making a rank 4. I haven’t found this to be enough of an issue though.
People also mention Masked Chameleon. While it’s a good card, and synergizes with Machina Gearframe, it’s too balanced – you can’t derp with it. I also don’t want to be reliant on getting Gearframe into the grave to make it.

Chaos – you can use the reptile stuff, as well as Mandragora, to run cards like Chaos Sorcerer and Black Luster Soldier… if you have some way of consistently getting lights in the grave. Veiler isn’t good enough, and Utopia isn’t worth running for this. I tried to create a build, and it looks so bad I never even really tried it. Though it was fun when I Big Eye’d BLS in someone else’s Chaos Gadgets build.

Salvage – back when I ran back row and just Tin Goldfish, I tried out Salvage to get them back. It was pretty cool. I might try it if I used Gear Gigant X but not Machina engine, since you’d be focusing on Tin Goldfish and rank 4 plays. In this build it isn’t viable, and I don’t think it’s powerful enough to justify what is sometimes a very terrible card to have in hand.

Photon Thrasher – just a big level 4 I used before I realized Gigantes is better. Also a light, for Chaos, though I never tried it.

Dust Knight – It’s a level 4, 1400/1200 ATK/DEF who has a flip effect to send any EARTH monster from the deck to the grave. I thought it’d be good with Fortress and Redox, but it’s way too slow, I’d always rather summon other things, and just generally not good. I was really excited about it for a bit though.

Grandsoil the Elemental Lord – I got some serious derp out of this card. With triple Gigantes and triple Redox, it was somewhat consistent… though I took it out even before Redox went to one. The problem was that if you didn’t win that turn, when your opponent got rid of it, you were pretty SOL. Didn’t like it.

Naturia Cherries – I tried it with Grandsoil too, and it was cute when my opponent had to deal with more of those annoying suckers. Plus having more tuners was nice. But oh my god, I hated drawing two. Just no. Never again.

Unfettered Draw Power – I’m talking Cardcar D, Upstart Goblin, Reckless Greed, and even Trade In here (for Machina Cannon!). You can critique these separately, but there’s one basic problem… what are you drawing? The slow, consistent pluses of thinning the Gadgets is great because then you don’t draw so many Gadgets. If you use all these other draw cards, you’ll draw more useless Gadgets, and for what? Being able to make another rank 4? Not necessary. I don’t care that Cardcard D is searchable with Gear Gigant X, there’s a good reason that Geargia don’t run it!

Tour Guide – the extra deck is too tight, it’s way, way not worth sacrificing rank 4 consistency.

Limiter Removal – I loved this card when I ran it. I want to point out right away that if it enables you to hit over just one monster that you otherwise wouldn’t have been able to, you mitigate what otherwise would be a -1. And Gearframe with any other machine in hand becomes an OTK, two gadgets hitting into an empty field with it is ~5000 damage, Gearframe can hit over Leo and Felgrand, Fortress can hit over… just about anything, and you can save a monster like Fortress or Gear Gigant X after using it by using Gearframe’s Union effect. But occasionally, I’d have to -1 off it by hitting over just one monster and then not exceeding. When I was making choices, it just had to go.

Gem Knight Pearl – I just rarely need it as a beater. When I was making choices, something had to come out, and it did.

Number 85: Crazy Box – This card is mostly here because it was nice against Skill Drain. I found though that most decks that run Skill Drain run a bunch of back row too, and Crazy Box can’t handle it. It had just been better to side hard against it, and use my primary engine and problem solvers.

Gagaga Cowboy – Situationally, we all know you can push for game with this card. And there are definitely times I wish I’d had it. But whenever I used it to hit over a monster, I was so unhappy about it, but it always died so easily! Just didn’t seem worth keeping in. In terms of beaters, I’d prefer Pearl over it, I think.

Fairy King Albverdich – You can make this card relatively consistently, but I just found that double Honor ARK seemed to be a better choice. It was better in Chaos Dragons days. Might make a comeback at some point.

Master of Blades – I thought, hey, it’s big, it’s EARTH, and Inzektors are rough, right? The first time I made it, it was against Inzektors, and they just equiped Gigamantis to Centipede, then Hornet, and… hit over. I thought it would be good against Fire Fist too, but I found they could too often use Tiger King to negate it and then pop it with Bear. Basically, it’s not much better than just having Redox and Fortress on the field.

Gaia Dragon, the Thunder Charger – I used to use Ancient Gear Gadjiltron Dragon back when Ultimate Offering was legal, and because of that I know the power of piercing. I’ve seriously considered running this third rank 7, also possibly because I may or may not run Mind Control which synergizes with this. I couldn’t justify taking out any rank 4s.

Geargiauger – I know this isn’t TCG yet, but I thought about it because of Gearframe. I might run it in a back row build, but in this build, it would just be terrible unless you had it first turn. It’s just too balanced of a card.

Number 104: Masquerade – I saw Dubkdad use this against Bujins in… thunder family maybe? I can’t remember, but it looked awesome, and I tried it for a while. While it’s great when you’re afraid of Honest, I just found that other answers were usually better, namely Blackship of Corn and Maestroke. They require less commitment as well.

Number 69: Heraldry Crest – If the negation was a condition instead of a trigger, I would love this card. It’s cool that it can be used to copy my own monsters, but it took too much commitment and typically if it was worth making I was winning anyway. It was better to put problem solvers in.

Rank-up Cards: None of the Exceeds I could run are good enough to justify both the extra deck space and main deck space. It’s really about putting all your eggs in one basket. I just wasn’t comfortable with it.

Chain Summoning – There was a gadget deck that used this and topped. It obviously works mostly with Kagetokage, which I already discussed I don’t prefer. But really the reason that guy topped was that Plus One Fist has a really tough time with two monsters. That was mostly it. This card is often dead, it involves a great deal of field commitment, and is just too vulnerable.

Scrap Recycler with Transmodify – Haven’t gotten a good build with this yet, but hope for it for one day!

Ancient Gear Gadjiltron Dragon [Honorable Mention] – This card isn’t really viable in this deck, but there was a time I used Magical Hats and Geartown to spam this sucker. With Ultimate Offering at three, I could tribute summon this guy pretty often too. My opponent would hit into a Gadget, I would summon another, and when there was a replay they’d just attack again, confused, then… BAM! Scary guy. I didn’t run the Machina engine back then, maybe there’s some way to build this with with Trade Ins and Machina Cannon. I’m thinking Plaguespreader Zombie to put extra Gadgets back maybe? And then I could synchro into Leo? Just rambling here now.

 

Conclusion

I totally didn’t proof-read this. Maybe I will later All other criticisms are welcome.

Pseudo, Latent and Potential Advantage in Yugioh

We all know that card advantage is very often more important than life points, especially early game. In fact, if that changes during a duel then that’s probably a good sign that you’re losing, since sacrificing card advantage for life points tends to be bad in the long run. Even when life points aren’t yet a concern though, raw advantage isn’t the end of the story. I’d like to bring in terminology to think explicitly about some special cases of advantage: pseudo advantage, where you technically have card advantage but it isn’t useful (e.g. Fiendish Chain after the target has left the field without being destroyed), latent advantage which I think is most clearly exemplified by baby dragon format, where someone could start their turn drawing Reactan, Dragon Ruler of Pebbles and controlling no other cards, and then +4 out of their grave, and (thanks to Jeffrey Seydel for this last one) potential advantage which is similar to latent advantage except it is advantage gained over many turns rather than being redeemable immediately.

Why does this matter though? Because of one card: Evilswarm Exciton Knight. Exciton is a generic, splashable extra deck card, and is relatively hard to stop once it hits the board (and the things that stop it all have some form of counter-counter). Bottomless Trap Hole, Compulsory Evacuation Device, and Torrential Tribute won’t protect your five backrow you set thinking they’d be safe, and Fiendish Chain could be countered with Mystical Space Typhoon. Even Effect Veiler doesn’t necessarily stop it, since a chained Book of Moon will prevent Veiler and maybe Skill Prisoner will see some play later when people realize how amazing it is.

The point is, having an inert Fiendish Chain or any other do-nothing cards can become a serious liability. Pseudo advantage makes your field extra vulnerable, especially if you use backrow heavily or use a deck that necessarily commits to the field such as OTK-oriented decks that are very make-it-or-break-it.

The flip-side of this is latent advantage and potential advantage. Dragon Rulers are a clear example of latent advantage, but cards which are pseudo advantage sometimes can become latent advantage. Fiendish Chain, for example, stops a monster effect which typically would have caused a change in advantage, either a search, special summon from grave or deck, or the removal of resources of the opponent, or even the destruction of a monster by battle (which is an often-overlooked but essential +1). Even though Fiendish Chain does not get rid of the monster it targets, it is often a net one-for-one when it negates the monster effect. If later the controller of Fiendish summons Scrap Dragon and destroys their Fiendish and an opponent’s card, this synergy has resulted in a net gain in advantage. This kind of latent advantage isn’t as safe as that of Dragon Rulers, since it is risky pseudo advantage at first, but is still a well-known and powerful combo.

Another form of pseudo advantage is having your cards but which are useless. Drawing a Blue-Eyes White Dragon in a deck that needs to discard it with Trade In, while not having that Trade In, is a form of card advantage but is unhelpful. In the same vein, if your opponent controls only Royal Decree and a beater, having five power traps set along with six more in hand is meaningless. You can be +9 to your opponent but if that advantage is pseudo advantage then it’s not going to help you.

Other examples of latent advantage include a single splashed Dragon Ruler in its appropriate deck (be it Blaster in Fire FistsTidal in Mermails or whatever else you can come up with). With 14 waters in grave, you have a potential +7 from Tidal, even though you can’t make use of it all in one turn. Tenki with Fire Fist Bear is another example, where controlling just a Tenki is very unhelpful but the two together become extremely powerful.

Bujins acquire latent advantage as well since a Turtle or Hare in grave do not count toward card advantage as traditionally thought of, or toward Exciton, but if your opponent needs to spend a card to get rid of something that can be protected then the Bujin player’s opponent must -1, but the Bujin player is still spending resources so if latent advantage is included then it is a 1-for-1 (of course, those Bujins in grave were probably a latent +1 thanks to Yamato). It is here that I think it most effective to point out — latent and potential advantage are often public knowledge. Being public knowledge means that oftentimes a skillful opponent can play around that advantage rather than attempting to exhaust it.

Latent advantage like this can be taken away as well using stun cards. Of course D.D. Crow can banish those Bujins and Dragon Rulers, but for the player using Crow doing so is -1 in terms of raw card advantage. Even Ally of Justice Cycle Reader is a raw -1 here, although if latent advantage is considered then it’s a powerful +1! (If you can get lucky and chain it to Bujincarnation it’s a raw 1-for-1, potentially a latent +2!) Another option is to use something like Soul Drain or Necrovalley, which renders however much latent advantage they have entirely inert and useless much like Royal Decree can do to traps. Similarly, Vanity’s Emptiness can render Dragon Rulers in the grave useless. All latent and potential advantage has at least one stun card.

I’d like to mention another differentiation between latent and potential advantage. In the case of a player who has a Dragon Ruler in grave, they clearly have a form of advantage which is readily available during their turn, but in no meaningful sense does it count during the opposing player’s turn. Sure, it could get banished and then could get a search, but that’s not responsive and it’s quite situational. Bujins on the other hand can use Turtle or Hare during either player’s turn, at nearly any point they’d want to. It’s worthwhile to note however that Hare is once-per turn, whereas Turtle is not, so having two Turtles should count as two cards toward latent advantage but having two Hares is a single card toward latent advantage and the other is potential advantage.

I’d also like to take potential advantage a step further, though I admit this is much fuzzier. A savvy player may want to consider it in terms of continuous monster engines, for deck building or thinking about a style of play against an opposing deck. Take for example Gadgets and Wind-ups. Gadgets and Wind-ups each have a way of plusing, for Gadgets its their own summon effects and for Wind-ups it’s Wind-up Factory, Wind-up Magician and Wind-up Rat. Gadgets can potentially gain a +8 (less if multiple are drawn, more if they’re somehow put back in the deck). Wind-ups… I don’t want to count, but there’s a lot (plus they can control multiple copies of Wind-up Factory!).

If you compare this to decks like Constellars or Evilswarm, they each have a harder time getting +1s. Evilswarm can manage it by taking a -1 to make Ophion (unless they sack that Rescue Rabbit), getting Infestation Infection, and then searching out those Kerykeions. The Evilswarm engine is much more fragile though, since they rely on their trap not being destroyed, they often run just one of that trap and so can’t simply search another, and they have to choose between searching it or Infestation Pandemic, which can be a really tough choice. Note however that Kerykeion is usually used immediately for an XYZ summon, and then isn’t available for pluses anymore. Once they’re all used, that engine is typically depleted. It usually ends after a +3, and those pluses are usually traded in immediately for a bigger monster (that admittedly that monster usually gets a +1, it doesn’t set up for later plays). Constellar have a play style that relies more on control with an XYZ which is inherently safe from spells and traps (Omega), and another monster that bounces potential problems (Pleiades), on top of having access to cards like Honest, on top of backrow; they rely on making a monster and sitting on it rather than maintaining shear advantage and then attempting to make responsive plays with their remaining resources.

I don’t wish to discuss in detail here the advantages and disadvantages of decks and archetypes which make use of robust engines or defending a single juggernaut, since it’s a matter of preference, play style, and honestly, meta. I mean here merely to talk about different forms of advantage, and to bring this up in terms of deck building. Most of this article pertains to in-duel considerations of advantage, but I simply wanted to point out that it can be considered for deck-building as well.

To come back to Gadgets and Wind-ups, they both have a relatively consistent form of potential advantage which far exceeds those of some other decks, but are of course interruptible. Their potential advantage can be taken away by an Effect Veiler or Mystical Space Typhoon, although I might make whole posts devoted to how I think each of those cards should be used. And of course, Mistake can be quite devastating as well, and decks like Constellars can use it synergistically, unlike Gadgets.

What about considering latent and potential advantage in terms of something like having Infernity Launcher with two Infernity Archfiends in grave? Considering that Launcher can get a +1, then each Archfiend can gain a another +1 (+3 so far) and then an Infernity Necromancer or two can be searched, each of which (if Stygian Street Patrol is in grave) could get another +1 (+5 so far), potentially getting another Archfiend which gets another +1 (+6!) it gets to be a big deal the number of potential pluses. Those are quite conditional though: Launcher could be destroyed by Mystical Space Typhoon; the Archfiends could be destroyed by Bottomless Trap Hole or Torrential Tribute; Maxx “C” could be chained to Launcher, inhibiting the longer-term pluses which rely on a lot of special summoning; Skill Drain can negate their effects; Royal Decree could render Infernity Barrier and Infernity Break searches useless. Each of these pluses has a condition, and the probability of an opponent having at least one of them increases the further into this change of plus-incurring events you go. Gadgets and Wind-ups as a counter case have much fewer cards that can interrupt them at one time, as well as having a greater probability of redundancy, since you will probably draw another Gadget, might draw another Wind-up Factory, definitely won’t draw another Launcher, and usually have less than a 1/20 chance of top decking another Infernity Archfiend if there’s still one in deck. Comparing this to Dragon Rulers, a Bottomless Trap Hole, Dimensional Prison, Spellbook of Fate or D.D. Crow or other banishing cards takes away that potential advantage, and Honor Ark is a very consistent though less powerful solution, to remove those potential pluses as well.

I’d like to conclude by summarizing that I simply think that this extra terminology can be more useful than the traditional view of raw advantage, which doesn’t get the whole picture. How exactly you might use it, and what specific values you’d apply in specific situations, can depend on exactly what cards occur during a duel. But taking an objective, holistic look at cards and their interaction is yet another way to prepare before and during duels to beat an opponent and control for luck, as well as avoid getting blown away by Exciton (which isn’t going away by the way!).

OkCupid 99%ers

I wrote a Python script to do some analysis of my 99% matches on OkCupid, the dating website. It’s might be against their Terms of Use, but I interpret

“…you agree that your use of the Website shall be for bona fide relationship-seeking purposes (for example, you may not use the Website solely to compile a report of compatible singles in your area, or to write a school research paper).”

(emphasis added) as meaning that what I’m doing is probably fine since I actually would like to find someone.

The script is in a repo that can be found here, and requires mechanize, lxml and sort of matplotlib. It also saves what it finds with pickle, to be nice to OkC’s servers, but making use of that data is kind of iffy right now.

Here’s the first image, a simple one.

Age

I’m 21 years old so it’s not surprising that most of my matches are grouped around my own age. All the bar graphs have this shape, a nice bell curve. There are a few outliers here you can see though. The total sample of 99% matches world-wide was like 208 people or something like that. I can’t remember (you can reverse-engineer it from the script) but I think that I searched by match percent, for people with images who had been online in the last month. I filtered by women, but not relationship status (more on that later).

Here’s a bar graph of my friend percents. I never understood what it meant or what it was for, and this wasn’t illuminating at all.

Friend Percents

And here’s the enemy percent, of which I pretty much feel the same way about.

Again, nice bell curves, with the only notable difference being that the enemy values were much lower and more concentrated. Next up is sexual orientation.

Now that I think about it, I’m not sure if the search was supposed to turn up gay women. I assume not, as in a sample this big I’d expect a few to show up. Oh well. It’s interesting that the women who I have high match rates with identify so frequently as bisexual. There’s the issue that a bunch of them may be lying but I can’t easily find out more on that. I also wondered how this compares to the general population, but I couldn’t find bi/pan-sexuality rates with some quick and dirty Google searching and they didn’t have an easy number (even for self-identification) on the OkTrends blog.

It doesn’t turn up in this data, but my high match rate matches tend to be queer or queer friendly, so I guess in this data set it’s more likely than the general population that they’re pansexual and attracted primarily to feminine/masculine and just haven’t come across other people like that. Anyway, gender is tricky!

Two more images. A kinda boring one, then my favorite.

Here’s the reply rates in a nice pie chart, not too interesting to me. Most of my matches are apparently the most selective, followed by very unselective. This data might be more interesting to me if I knew what the general population looked like. Whatever. If someone else has anything interesting to say I’d like to hear it, but let’s get to my favorite pie chart!

(“seeing” means “seeing someone”. It was easier to code this way though.)

I love this one because the result is relatively unexpected (for me anyway). Only just over half of my matches on a dating site are single? Wtf? It makes more sense if you take a second to think about, and know what the profiles look like (which you don’t, but I do). A ton of my matches are polyamorous or in open relationships. What this means for me is tricky, but in terms of just looking at this data, that’s where that comes from, and it makes this pie chart make more sense.

Lastly, I looked at where people were in cities/states (including nations outside the US as states). I tried making a pie chart out of the states, but it was too crowded.

[…]

Canada (13, 6.25%)
Ontario (4)
British Columbia (3)
Alberta (2)
Manitoba (2)
Quebec (2)

Washington (15, 7.21%)
Seattle (10)
Lynnwood
Tacoma
Bellevue
Pullman
Mount Vernon

Massachusetts (16, 7.69%)
Boston (5)
Somerville (3)
Cambridge
Chestnut Hill
Jamaica Plain
Andover
Middleboro
Beverly
Waltham
Brighton

New York (20, 9.62%)
New York (6)
Brooklyn (4)
Ithaca (2)
Jackson Heights
Kingston
Troy
Brockport
Flushing
Bronx
Avon
Buffalo

California (23, 11.06%)
San Francisco (5)
Los Angeles (4)
Berkeley (4)
Vallejo
Los Gatos
Menlo Park
Mill Valley
Claremont
Anaheim Hills
Pasadena
Newbury Park
Oakland
Mendocino

What more can I do? The next thing I want to do is make a word cloud (or whatever they’re called). I’d have to scrape the 208 profiles to do this though, and even though I made like 100 requests to compile this data, I’m gonna save that for another day. I expect words like “feminist”, “liberal”, “queer” and the like to show up a lot, but I’m looking forward to finding out new stuff! Also, some nice pie charts on religion and “looking for” will be nice.

Something I tried to do was order the 99%ers (just for curiosity) but that part of the code doesn’t seem to work. I made some assumptions which might not be true, and used my friend’s code without understanding it, since I was busy writing the rest of this. Another possible issue was that the data changed as I was scraping it.

Feedback on this would be cool. Ideas to extend it, what I could have done differently, or even vaguely related stuff would be awesome to hear about.